Literary Rejections on Display: John Fox Makes the Skies ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Spell Check Sting

Posted on 7:45 AM by humpty
Ouch. But you've got to admit that the editor is a kind fellow and handled this situation well. The mouse who sent this rejection in wrote: "I honestly did run spell check, but the big bull couldn't take a few small errors":
Dear Mr. [Poet's Last Name]: Thank you for your submission, [“Name of Poem”], I regret that we cannot use your poem. I highly recommend that you look at issue 8 and 9, and soon, issue 10, to get a better idea of what we looking for. The competition is fierce, so you might want to pay extra careful attention to spelling and punctuation errors. I make them all the time myself, but I am thankful for “spell check” in my word processor to catch most of them. It might benefit you, too. Good luck in placing your poem. Best regards, John C. Mannone, Silver Blade Poetry Editor
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in nice | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Count Down Day 25--Why No One Comments on My Blog
    "Man, you're not getting no comments...what's up with that?" was a comment I received just a few days ago. This is from so...
  • One Man Guy by Michael Barakiva
    Michael's book title spells OMG and it is released today! Here's what he wants you to know about his victory over rejection:  ...
  • Is It Rejection Cartoon Tuesday Already?
    Why, yes, my friends, it is rejection cartoon Tuesday. Here you go:
  • Why Even Let Yourself Hope?
    This journal  takes the guess work out of your submission. "The founding principle of the Journal of Universal Rejection (JofUR) is rej...
  • A New Digital New Yorker Rejection is in Play
    I received the following notice from an LROD reader, who received a new (signed) New Yorker digital rejection that varies from our last digi...
  • You've Got Such an Unusual Mind
    An anonymous LROD reader sent this rejection in for your consideration.  It's from Rattle , a journal of "Poetry for the 21st Centu...
  • Double Neg Pretentious: Not Without Merit
    This irritating rejection says it formally:   "While your proposal is not without merit, we are forced to give serious consideration to...
  • Fully Committed
    This was sent in by an LROD Mouse, who says of the rejection, "I particularly like how appreciative they are about my commitment to qua...
  • Down for the Count
    Dudes, I had a little surgery yesterday, so was offline. Nothing glamorous like a face/ass lift or a nose/boob job.  Just a little oral situ...
  • Terribleminds
    Here's an article called " 25 Things Writers Should Know About Rejection ."  Self described as "booze-soaked, profanity-l...

Categories

  • A book at last
  • Agent 99
  • alas
  • amusing
  • annoying
  • archival
  • betsy lerner
  • boring
  • Count Down To WR's Identity
  • darin strauss
  • earnest
  • exemplary
  • famous
  • industry response
  • jacob appel
  • just plain crappy
  • mean
  • media attention
  • MFA question
  • misguided
  • Narrative Magazine
  • New Yorker
  • nice
  • question of the month
  • rejection advice
  • rejection confession
  • reversal rejection
  • rosemary ahern
  • secret agent man
  • snap
  • strange
  • the death of fiction
  • tiered
  • Tin House
  • victory over rejection
  • Vonnegut
  • VQR
  • what the google?
  • WR's journey

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (130)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2012 (108)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ▼  2011 (211)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ▼  March (19)
      • The Play's The Thing--But Not Yours
      • Spell Check Sting
      • Manhattan Judge Says No
      • Rock and Roll, Ladies!
      • Darn Fallopian Tubes
      • Policy to Pass on Engaging & Well-Written
      • There's An App For That
      • One Reader Felt...
      • Update: Working on It
      • From The Mailbag
      • Your Writing Was the True Weakness of This Book
      • It's All So Dizzying
      • 100,000 Versions of the Same Novel
      • Save Us Marc Jacobs
      • Relaunching The "Agent 4 Appel" Campaign!
      • Rejection from the Hoosier State
      • Girl's Got Chutzpah!
      • The New Eff Ewe
      • More Advice From the Discontented
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2010 (49)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

humpty
View my complete profile