Literary Rejections on Display: John Fox Makes the Skies ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Spell Check Sting

Posted on 7:45 AM by humpty
Ouch. But you've got to admit that the editor is a kind fellow and handled this situation well. The mouse who sent this rejection in wrote: "I honestly did run spell check, but the big bull couldn't take a few small errors":
Dear Mr. [Poet's Last Name]: Thank you for your submission, [“Name of Poem”], I regret that we cannot use your poem. I highly recommend that you look at issue 8 and 9, and soon, issue 10, to get a better idea of what we looking for. The competition is fierce, so you might want to pay extra careful attention to spelling and punctuation errors. I make them all the time myself, but I am thankful for “spell check” in my word processor to catch most of them. It might benefit you, too. Good luck in placing your poem. Best regards, John C. Mannone, Silver Blade Poetry Editor
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in nice | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Next Readings: NYC! Thursday, Jan 15th at KGB Bar and Sunday at Book Culture (81st & Columbus)
    Last Friday at the reading in Cambridge @HarvardBooks, co-sponsored by @Grubstreet, I met a loyal LROD reader, who is a blogger and novelist...
  • Count Down Day 25--Why No One Comments on My Blog
    "Man, you're not getting no comments...what's up with that?" was a comment I received just a few days ago. This is from so...
  • One Man Guy by Michael Barakiva
    Michael's book title spells OMG and it is released today! Here's what he wants you to know about his victory over rejection:  ...
  • Is It Rejection Cartoon Tuesday Already?
    Why, yes, my friends, it is rejection cartoon Tuesday. Here you go:
  • A New Digital New Yorker Rejection is in Play
    I received the following notice from an LROD reader, who received a new (signed) New Yorker digital rejection that varies from our last digi...
  • Double Neg Pretentious: Not Without Merit
    This irritating rejection says it formally:   "While your proposal is not without merit, we are forced to give serious consideration to...
  • Subject Object Confusion
    A friend of mine posted this rejection note on her blog: "I really liked the concept but the story missed its chance to connect with me...
  • Don't Come Calling Without An Agent
    Looks like Tin House has a new policy. The mouse who sent this in noted that he would no longer be reading Tin House in protest.  What do y...
  • When Assholes Fly
    This is a fantastic rejection letter: a) referral to a different editor, b) a tip about what will and will not work for the publication. Als...
  • Independence Day 2011
    Happy 4th of July, Rosemary Ahern (wherever you are).

Categories

  • A book at last
  • Agent 99
  • alas
  • amusing
  • annoying
  • archival
  • betsy lerner
  • boring
  • Count Down To WR's Identity
  • darin strauss
  • earnest
  • exemplary
  • famous
  • industry response
  • jacob appel
  • just plain crappy
  • mean
  • media attention
  • MFA question
  • misguided
  • Narrative Magazine
  • New Yorker
  • nice
  • question of the month
  • rejection advice
  • rejection confession
  • reversal rejection
  • rosemary ahern
  • secret agent man
  • snap
  • strange
  • the death of fiction
  • tiered
  • Tin House
  • victory over rejection
  • Vonnegut
  • VQR
  • what the google?
  • WR's journey

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (130)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2012 (108)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ▼  2011 (211)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ▼  March (19)
      • The Play's The Thing--But Not Yours
      • Spell Check Sting
      • Manhattan Judge Says No
      • Rock and Roll, Ladies!
      • Darn Fallopian Tubes
      • Policy to Pass on Engaging & Well-Written
      • There's An App For That
      • One Reader Felt...
      • Update: Working on It
      • From The Mailbag
      • Your Writing Was the True Weakness of This Book
      • It's All So Dizzying
      • 100,000 Versions of the Same Novel
      • Save Us Marc Jacobs
      • Relaunching The "Agent 4 Appel" Campaign!
      • Rejection from the Hoosier State
      • Girl's Got Chutzpah!
      • The New Eff Ewe
      • More Advice From the Discontented
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2010 (49)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

humpty
View my complete profile