Literary Rejections on Display: John Fox Makes the Skies ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

100,000 Versions of the Same Novel

Posted on 6:24 AM by humpty


I was looking back through some old computer files, trying to find a particular scene from a long-ago version of my novel because I thought I might be able to use it in this current revision. For seem reason, seeing all those versions of my novel kind of depressed me. Like over a decade's worth of versions, each holding my little fragile dream of success in its pages. Seriously any one of them could have been the one, but instead they are all just little ugly, deformed clones of one another that didn't work out. A friend of mine shook me out of the bad feeling by saying that every novelist has files and files of versions of the same book, and that all those ones that didn't work are like stepping stones to the one that does work, at least we hope like hell it works, as indicated by the use of the present tense. (Do you mice have this experience?) I don't usually succumb to feelings of regret, especially about my work, but it did kind of bum me out. Like: Why is this taking so long? Why do I have to be the one to write the same book for 13 years? Why can't I be like Joyce Carol Oates who whips out a book every ten minutes? Then I found this Thoreau quotation, which I share with you above. Oh, and, by the way, I did find the scene I was looking for in a version from 1999, and I am able to use it in the new version, so all is not lost.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in WR's journey | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Count Down Day 25--Why No One Comments on My Blog
    "Man, you're not getting no comments...what's up with that?" was a comment I received just a few days ago. This is from so...
  • One Man Guy by Michael Barakiva
    Michael's book title spells OMG and it is released today! Here's what he wants you to know about his victory over rejection:  ...
  • Is It Rejection Cartoon Tuesday Already?
    Why, yes, my friends, it is rejection cartoon Tuesday. Here you go:
  • Why Even Let Yourself Hope?
    This journal  takes the guess work out of your submission. "The founding principle of the Journal of Universal Rejection (JofUR) is rej...
  • A New Digital New Yorker Rejection is in Play
    I received the following notice from an LROD reader, who received a new (signed) New Yorker digital rejection that varies from our last digi...
  • You've Got Such an Unusual Mind
    An anonymous LROD reader sent this rejection in for your consideration.  It's from Rattle , a journal of "Poetry for the 21st Centu...
  • Double Neg Pretentious: Not Without Merit
    This irritating rejection says it formally:   "While your proposal is not without merit, we are forced to give serious consideration to...
  • Fully Committed
    This was sent in by an LROD Mouse, who says of the rejection, "I particularly like how appreciative they are about my commitment to qua...
  • Down for the Count
    Dudes, I had a little surgery yesterday, so was offline. Nothing glamorous like a face/ass lift or a nose/boob job.  Just a little oral situ...
  • Terribleminds
    Here's an article called " 25 Things Writers Should Know About Rejection ."  Self described as "booze-soaked, profanity-l...

Categories

  • A book at last
  • Agent 99
  • alas
  • amusing
  • annoying
  • archival
  • betsy lerner
  • boring
  • Count Down To WR's Identity
  • darin strauss
  • earnest
  • exemplary
  • famous
  • industry response
  • jacob appel
  • just plain crappy
  • mean
  • media attention
  • MFA question
  • misguided
  • Narrative Magazine
  • New Yorker
  • nice
  • question of the month
  • rejection advice
  • rejection confession
  • reversal rejection
  • rosemary ahern
  • secret agent man
  • snap
  • strange
  • the death of fiction
  • tiered
  • Tin House
  • victory over rejection
  • Vonnegut
  • VQR
  • what the google?
  • WR's journey

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (130)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2012 (108)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ▼  2011 (211)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ▼  March (19)
      • The Play's The Thing--But Not Yours
      • Spell Check Sting
      • Manhattan Judge Says No
      • Rock and Roll, Ladies!
      • Darn Fallopian Tubes
      • Policy to Pass on Engaging & Well-Written
      • There's An App For That
      • One Reader Felt...
      • Update: Working on It
      • From The Mailbag
      • Your Writing Was the True Weakness of This Book
      • It's All So Dizzying
      • 100,000 Versions of the Same Novel
      • Save Us Marc Jacobs
      • Relaunching The "Agent 4 Appel" Campaign!
      • Rejection from the Hoosier State
      • Girl's Got Chutzpah!
      • The New Eff Ewe
      • More Advice From the Discontented
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2010 (49)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

humpty
View my complete profile