Literary Rejections on Display: John Fox Makes the Skies ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, September 30, 2011

An Open Proposal to Secret Agent Man

Posted on 9:15 AM by humpty
Okay, mice, I'm hoping to put this chapter on biopsies and novels behind us.
     I had another biopsy yesterday with a different method, which was awesomely, eye-stingingly painful--shockingly so. But it seems they got a robust sample of cells, and if it all goes well, I can skip the hospital deep dig version of this test. It was no picnic, it took several practitioners to excavate, but it's over now and on Monday the cancer answer will be revealed. (By the way, the mathematical odds of my having cancer are very, very slim. I mean, super slim.)
     So I'm not worried, and I'm already moving on.
     You may think this is a cavalier attitude to take, given my lack of luck in most matters lately, but look at it this way, my chance of having cancer is even slimmer than my chance of publishing a novel in this climate. So, for now, I'm putting them both away.
     You can be happy to think of me quietly working on my juicy cultural memoir Daddy Dearest. (Just kidding, that's not the title.) My book is more of an attempt to figure out how disinheritance became my fate, a surprise delivered via a secret will.  (Who does that crap?) Did you know that only in this country is disinheriting a child a protected right?  The rest of the world finds it unthinkable.
     BTW, in regard to all this, I've been thinking about asking an agent friend, whom I call SECRET AGENT MAN, to represent the memoir. I'd much rather he get any money that might possibly be made on my career than any of the douches I've met over the years. Plus he's a super good guy, he knows about my blog and all my douchery, including stupid past decisions and dumb impatient ways. He represents very big memoirs, and he just started his own business.
     The question is: Will he take me on knowing what he knows about me? I would promise not to post anything he writes to me on this blog, unless he posts it himself. Maybe we could have a totally blog-worthy public relationship, communicating only via LROD, so others can see what an author/agent relationship is like.  Well, maybe that goes a step too far. But I do think this book at least stands a better chance of making some dough. It's got commercial appeal, it's got hollywood starlets, and it's got...me.

    So, what do you say, SECRET AGENT MAN? Will you take me on?
Read More
Posted in question of the month, rejection confession, secret agent man, WR's journey | No comments

Thursday, September 29, 2011

A Promise for You

Posted on 7:32 AM by humpty
Having a different procedure today to get at the cells in question; hope this one works. In the meantime here's a cute little form letter from Arts & Letters for your rejection enjoyment:
Thanks for giving us the chance to read your work; unfortunately, it doesn't meet our needs at this time. However, we promise that if you keep writing, we'll keep reading. All the best, The Editors, Arts & Letters 
Read More
Posted in amusing | No comments

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Update: Biopsy and Books

Posted on 5:17 AM by humpty
Thanks to all you mice for the fortifying thoughts and wishes.  I took you right with me into that gruesome procedure. Unfortch, it didn't go quite as swimmingly well as hoped, but I will find out today if indeed they got as many cells as they need to hunt down any cancer. If not, I may have to go the hospital for deeper dive. Either way, I should know the scoop by this afternoon. I have a strong feeling that everything is going to be nice and healthy in there. And if not, the good news is that I am truly one of the lucky ones to have very good insurance and access to medical experts. So, we will therefore carry on.
     As for, Agent 99, I have to say my overriding feeling is one of relief. I've been on pins and needles for a year, trying to become someone I'm not, trying to make my book something it's not, just so she'd send the blessed thing out. That was not a winning combination. I might as well have been back in my family of origin; I was never "good enough" for those freaks either. No more of that, mice. From now on, it's pretty much going to be take it or leave it. I'll wait until I have a real editor before I mess around with the book again. In the meantime, I'm going to let it hibernate for a while until I can get a clear thought going about what to do with it next re: going back to the original or keeping the version the genius rejecting agent says is muddled.
     In the meantime, I've had a kind of breakthrough with my non-fiction book. I think I'm going to get it together as a proposal and see if I can start there. It is the most commercial, marketable thing that has ever happened to me (disinheritance). Then if I get some bites, I can work backward through my unpublished opus: the novel, the collection of published fiction, the book of published essays, the other nonfiction project. (Don't you love the word "opus"? So much better than "evidence of wasting one's life.")
     So that's the scoop for now.  How about if I embed a nice little rejection in the middle of this long post, just for fun? A loyal reader sent this one from Ashley at Bateau Press, where the tag line is "Lit to float your boat."
So sorry if you received a response that told you your work was out of our scope. Ugh! New system quirks: we didn't realize it was sending that email out to everyone. Just disregard it. thanks! ashley
We all make mistakes, ashley. We all really do. Peace out, for now.
UPDATE: They didn't get the cells. More medical barbarism is needed. Unlucky in literature and diagnostics this month. Not sorry to see September go.  
Read More
Posted in rejection confession, WR's journey | No comments

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Agent 99 Bites

Posted on 5:52 AM by humpty

People, people, people: You are going to hate this almost as much as I do. First, I ask you to recall that it's been a year of my working with said Agent 99 from the large fancy literary agency. Back and forth we went with changes and revisions and her idea about how to "fix" my novel. Together here at LROD we have discussed the merits of working on edits with an agent, of compromising one's art, but we have seen nothing like this so far. Are you ready for it? I am going to leave the picking apart of this amazing rejection to beat all rejections to you and your witty, wonderful ways.  You may also feel free to berate me about being naive enough to believe I was finally on my way; all I had to do was fix "a little structural problem" without "muddling" everything up, and that would be that. Have at it! I am taking to my bed today. As for our recent discussions about whether or not it is a good idea to respond to rejection letters, I thought of writing the following: Dear Agent 99: I'm not sure what's worse this week, the fact that after stringing me along for an entire calendar year, you are now rejecting me because my novel now seems muddled and always seemed to dark, or the fact that I have to face a painful biopsy for some suspected cancer.  You really stink.  Best, W,R. Of course, I will let my silence speak instead. Sadly, friends, the part about suspected cancer is true. I'm sure it's going to turn out perfectly fine and not be anything malignant, but then again, for a cynic, I am eternally optimistic.  I have a biopsy tomorrow, so may not get online to post until next week. Send some good thoughts my way if you are able. Man...life can be a kick in the teeth, right? What a week!

Here's what Agent 99 had to say:

Dear _________:   
     This is a difficult email for me to write, but after a lot of time and careful reads from me and a few trusted colleagues here, I’m afraid I’m going to have to walk away from [slightly incorrect Title of Book...really? You couldn't get it right?]. I really do admire you personally and as a writer, and I’m sorry it took so long for me to make this decision, but I don’t think we’re seeing eye-to-eye editorially in the way I would like. 
     I think you’re such a talented writer, and I love your style and your unique sense of prose and voice. That said, ultimately the book still isn’t working in the way I would need it to in order be its very best advocate. I have too many hesitations remaining, and indeed, even though we decided it was best to tie the two parts together (which I do think is crucial to the book) I’m still not seeing the execution I would like.
      The redraft has also confused the original intent of the book and muddled some of the elements I loved earlier on. In this incarnation, it seems so obvious to me that [name of character] is the culprit, and the adding in of [detail] and the [different detail] from the start creates so many plot lines, so many characters to focus on, that I lost [main character's name] a bit. I also still find the darkness of the book overbearing, an issue I’ve had throughout the times I’ve read, and worry that you haven’t found a way to alleviate this. 
     It’s very unusual that I take someone on editorially unless I truly believe in them, and I do believe in you, absolutely. But I also think we’ve come to an impasse. I only hope that giving you my time and advice on the manuscript has helped you in your journey a bit, and I’m sorry to say that my love for the book is not enough to take it forward. You and this novel deserve the passionate representation that I can’t provide, and so I think I should step aside before we go any further. I’m certain that I’ll see your name on shelves someday, and I’ll be cheering from the sidelines. 
     Yours,
     Agent 99
p.s. As you can see, she's really not "mine". Yours is just a nice thing people say at the end of a terrible letter. Oh well. Fuck it.
Read More
Posted in Agent 99, WR's journey | No comments

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Agent Talk Back

Posted on 6:22 AM by humpty
After being rejected, writer Jackson Bliss had this to say to Nat Sobel's assistant:
Thanks for taking the time to read a partial of my near-finished novel. Since we will never work together, I guess I can be frank and come out and say that I'm sad and disappointed, but it's a business, so I'll do my best not to take it personally (though it's hard not to). Yes, I've certainly heard the Junot Diaz comparison before + I query Nicole Aragi annually but she only takes referrals. I will say, though, that I've never heard someone suggest that Junot Diaz, or a writer who has certain stylistic similarities to Junot Diaz, has a limited readership though. I haven't checked his Nielson bookscan stats in years, but I have this feeling that Junot Diaz's sales are probably very good. If I can achieve half the success that he has, I'd consider myself a prodigy. Since I am myself of mixed Asian ancestry (a quarter Japanese) but I don't look Asian (much like Hidashi), I feel that I have an awesome platform for ". . .", which, as Nat himself has pointed out, is becoming more + more necessary, even for fiction writers + I want to find an agency that will support my (future) career of writing Asian-American fiction with strong male characters that defy stereotypes of Asian masculinity while also challenging the cliché of minimalism in Asian-American literary fiction, which has become the norm. I know now that Sobel Weber Associates isn't the right literary agency for me but I thank you wholeheartedly for your honesty + your willingness to read partial of two of my novels. I wish you and Nat much future success. I also look forward to proving you wrong.
Seems like a trend to write back to agents, though maybe not a very productive trend. I mean she compared the dude to Junot Diaz. What do you think about the idea of sending a note back to someone who rejected you?
Read More
Posted in snap | No comments

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

"Preclude"...A Good Penn State Word

Posted on 8:00 AM by humpty


Thank you for giving us the opportunity to read your work. We have decided it does not suit our current needs. We wish you luck in placing it elsewhere, and we regret that the large volume of submissions we receive precludes a more personal reply. Editors, Lake Effect
Read More
Posted in earnest | No comments

Monday, September 19, 2011

How to Succeed in Rejection

Posted on 7:26 AM by humpty
If they use the title twice in a rejection note it seems more like they did indeed read it closely and give it careful consideration. That is, if you fall for that kind of thing.
Thank you for sending your work to Narrative. We are always grateful for the opportunity to review new material, and we have given "Title" close reading and careful consideration. We found many strengths to recommend your work and, overall, much to admire. We regret, however, that "Title" is not quite right for us. We encourage you try us again in the future, and we hope that you will. Sincerely, The Editors  
BACKSTAGE | NARRATIVE PRIZE | ABOUT US | A Nonprofit Publication of Narrative Press
Read More
Posted in Narrative Magazine | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Next Readings: NYC! Thursday, Jan 15th at KGB Bar and Sunday at Book Culture (81st & Columbus)
    Last Friday at the reading in Cambridge @HarvardBooks, co-sponsored by @Grubstreet, I met a loyal LROD reader, who is a blogger and novelist...
  • Social Media, Social Media, Social Media
    But will it save you from literary rejection? This article at Business2Community has some words on the matter and a very tenuous (IMHO) ass...
  • What's Your Literary New Year's Resolution?
    Mine is to get the novel published, same as it is always is, but also to make some tracks into the memoir. Oh, and not to be so neurotic abo...
  • What If I Didn't Comment...Would You Fill In?
  • Glowy People Magazine Review and Sweet Huffington Post Interview....(I Kid You Not, People)
    Predictions that the final post would not be my final post have come to fruition. But how could I go any further in this life and world wit...
  • Today is the Day
    I've been keeping my head down because Secret Agent Man and I have been working like dogs to get my non-fiction book proposal ready. To...
  • What Do We Think of This Dude?
    In this interview , Stephen Markley claims George Bush wrote him a note about his book, titled Publish This Book . The premature author also...
  • Count Down Day....Ah, Screw It. No One is Counting Down with Me Anyway. (Final Post)
    You will understand the miracle of the blurb on the cover of my novel, if you are an LROD fan. You see, little rodents, good things can happ...
  • Upcoming Events: Perhaps You Will Join Me?
    TWITTER: Guest host on ‪#‎ LitChat‬ , Monday, January 5th from 4-5 p.m. UPCOMING READINGS: Friday, January 9th at 7 pm: Harvard Books in ...
  • Is this real?
    I don't know, but it is freakin' awesome.

Categories

  • A book at last
  • Agent 99
  • alas
  • amusing
  • annoying
  • archival
  • betsy lerner
  • boring
  • Count Down To WR's Identity
  • darin strauss
  • earnest
  • exemplary
  • famous
  • industry response
  • jacob appel
  • just plain crappy
  • mean
  • media attention
  • MFA question
  • misguided
  • Narrative Magazine
  • New Yorker
  • nice
  • question of the month
  • rejection advice
  • rejection confession
  • reversal rejection
  • rosemary ahern
  • secret agent man
  • snap
  • strange
  • the death of fiction
  • tiered
  • Tin House
  • victory over rejection
  • Vonnegut
  • VQR
  • what the google?
  • WR's journey

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2015 (2)
    • ▼  January (2)
      • Next Readings: NYC! Thursday, Jan 15th at KGB Bar ...
      • Did You Know Cambridge Was Its Own Place? READING ...
  • ►  2014 (130)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2012 (108)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2011 (211)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2010 (49)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

humpty
View my complete profile