Literary Rejections on Display: John Fox Makes the Skies ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Regarding Your Blood and Guts

Posted on 8:35 AM by humpty
Hmmm....well, same as yesterday, today the future is still yet to be written. There are a couple of editors who are interested but who haven't responded to the herding call yet. I guess it takes some time to get an offer together. So, as usual, you set the rules, and when no one plays by them, you then set them again, which is to say that the rules belong to the other players, and you just sit and wait politely. Tap, tap, tap....nothing. So, we wait some more. In the meantime, I ask you to consider this rejection (and to cross your fingers for me too):
Thank you for considering Muscle and Blood a potential home for your fiction. Unfortunately, we have decided to pass on your story. Discussion led us to believe that your work may benefit from a re-draft, specifically focused on the ending. Please feel free to submit other work in the future, and we wish you the best of luck with your writing. Regards, Christopher Przewloka
Read More
Posted in annoying, WR's journey | No comments

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Reading Your No-Luck Future

Posted on 10:04 AM by humpty
I like the idea that editors are "reading art" when they read our work. It seems less insulting if they don't like the art that way. I'm not sure why. Probably only because I'm not a painter.
Thank you for the privilege of reading your art. We've considered it carefully, but I'm sorry to report we have decided not to accept it for publication. We do want to wish you luck in placing it elsewhere, and bode you success with all your writing endeavors. Best, Brad Felver, Fiction Editor, Mid-American Review
Speaking of futures, today is the day Secret Agent Man herds in the cats and we find out who is going to make a bid on my book proposal(s). It is a special day, but let's not forget what skittish cats these are. Will we have a deal or no deal? Book or no book? The future is not yet written, which is always kind of an exciting moment because that means the problems have not yet arrived. I can believe whatever I want to believe, which is that one of these felines is going to see the value in said proposed book.  But mice, you know how cats are, so cross yourselves for me and pray that the catnip is strong this seasons. (p.s. Remember Agent 99? Wonder how she's doing?)
Read More
Posted in secret agent man, WR's journey | No comments

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Do Not Look

Posted on 7:16 AM by humpty

It's not that the story wasn't right for the journal; it simply wasn't right for any of the upcoming issues the editor had in mind. Plus a few compliments: well written, interesting and original. Add an expectation of reading more work in the future with a casual first-name signature indicating that we are all good friends in the enterprise. The writer can feel pretty happy about this successful rejection, a sweet oxymoron. Got to love those Parisians:
Dear [first name of writer]: Thanks for your submission to Do Not Look at the Sun. I enjoyed reading your short story, 'Title', though unfortunately felt that it was not the right fit for any of the forthcoming issues that I have in mind. Thank you for the opportunity to read it; it is very well written and an interesting and original piece of fiction. I wish you well with submitting it elsewhere and I look forward to reading more submissions from you in the future. Kind regards, Anthony
Read More
Posted in amusing | No comments

Monday, February 6, 2012

What's the MacGuffin

Posted on 7:25 PM by humpty
I had a writing teacher once (undergraduate program, as you know I never got an MFA) who spoke lovingly of mcguffins during our workshops. It wasn't until years later that I understood the origin of the word. Same with a second undergraduate writing professor who used to say, "You have to kill your darlings;" I didn't know he was loosely rephrasing a famous quote. Someone sent this rejection in for publishing here at LROD:
Thank you for submitting “Title” to The MacGuffin. Although we are unable to publish your work at this time, we thank you for the opportunity to review it.The MacGuffin has a thorough and vigorous reading process. With the large number of submissions we receive, the editorial process can be quite lengthy. Please know that your work is important to us and has been given careful consideration.We appreciate your interest in The MacGuffin and hope you will submit again. We wish you all the best in your writing endeavors. Sincerely,Elizabeth Kircos, Fiction/Non-Fiction Editor, The MacGuffin
Read More
Posted in famous | No comments

Friday, February 3, 2012

Time to Fill You In

Posted on 11:38 AM by humpty
All right, peeps. Here's the scoop. I've written and sent out my book proposal via Secret Agent Man, who it turns out took me up on THIS OFFER. A few people said no, but a few are interested. Because I was writing a kind of hybrid book: one company is interested in one half of the book, and another is interested in the another half of the book.  Why not do two books? I asked. But my agents says that's not contractually kosher. So we are where we are.    
     I have written another version of the book proposal in these weeks, which would lean more heavily on memoir. That would be swell with me, but I do still think memoir+information will make for a bigger book on the topic. So, we'll see. There are a few other editors who are getting second and third reads of the proposals inside their publishing houses, so more may be forthcoming.
     Publishing is much slower and more considered than it was back in the day when people pounced and bought. But I'm happy to be in this position at long last.  Remember the days when I banged my head against the wall trying to get my wonderful literary novel published?  Remember how close I came at Grove and Ballantine with fiction, only to be dashed at the last minute? Ah, those were the bloody days.This seems more civilized, though I am not without the thought that hope-dashing could still happen.  So, stand by, and we shall see.  
      Feel free to write in with thoughts on the process, or to tell me that I should stick to my guns about what kind of book I'm writing, though frankly either one is fine by me. There's more than one way to skin the cat.
     By the way, those of you who read the article, my one major family's response was that there were not THAT many guns in the house when we grew up. (!) Seriously? On a visit home, I once had to remove several rifles from the bed I was going to sleep in and step over a pile of other rifles in boxes stacked in the room.  Hmmm? That seems like a lot of guns to me. But this is why I write, right?  Because my family does not offer comments like, "Oh, that must have been painful." Or "You write well." Or....I don't know, say, anything other than a comment about how many guns we had in the house, which by the way, was a lot.
     Oh well. It makes a good blog post even if I have said "we shall see" too many times. (But we shall.)
Read More
Posted in WR's journey | No comments

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Fiddlesticks!

Posted on 2:49 PM by humpty
I don't like that whole publishing "cheers!" thing, which reminds me of "alas," like we need a shorthand for their chipper or remorseful emotions, but I do like this guy's style. It's always nice to say something positive, just like Mother taught us. Rejection sent in from an LROD reader:
We enjoyed reading your work, but "Title" is not quite the right fit for Fiddleblack, so we'll have to pass. Nice rhythm in your voice, though. Thanks for thinking of us as a possible publisher of your work, and best of luck with this piece. Cheers.
Jason Cook, Founding Editor | Fiddleblack ltd
(216) 200-8040 · http://fiddleblack.org
Read More
Posted in alas | No comments

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Sign Your Name, Sirs

Posted on 5:04 PM by humpty
Have some respect for the dying art of the paper rejection, please.  Is it too difficult to put your name to paper?  Ah, I'm just yanking your chain. It really doesn't matter, does it?
Read More
Posted in misguided | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Next Readings: NYC! Thursday, Jan 15th at KGB Bar and Sunday at Book Culture (81st & Columbus)
    Last Friday at the reading in Cambridge @HarvardBooks, co-sponsored by @Grubstreet, I met a loyal LROD reader, who is a blogger and novelist...
  • Social Media, Social Media, Social Media
    But will it save you from literary rejection? This article at Business2Community has some words on the matter and a very tenuous (IMHO) ass...
  • Will You Be My Father/Agent And Never Disinherit me?
    Tim Seldes is an old-timey gentleman agent. I got a rejection from him too.  I chatted with him once, not knowing that he was an agent, a l...
  • What If I Didn't Comment...Would You Fill In?
  • Glowy People Magazine Review and Sweet Huffington Post Interview....(I Kid You Not, People)
    Predictions that the final post would not be my final post have come to fruition. But how could I go any further in this life and world wit...
  • Cutbank Rejection
    Dear [first name of writer]: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to read “[title of piece].” While we very much enjoyed your work, after...
  • Simplification
    It could become the universal rejection.
  • Christmas Comes Early
    I woke up this morning, and I knew how to fix my novel. I've been restructuring it since November, but I had a pacing issue. Figured out...
  • Count Down Day 26--What's The Real Deal With Me & Jacob Appel?
    Jacob Appel is a prince among male writers. He is also prolific and smart and an interesting guy.  He is the second winner of the Golden Ap...
  • An Agent Writes In...But Not My Agent
    A good-humored agent sent me the following correspondence, which consists of the agent's rejection, followed by a rather snarky response...

Categories

  • A book at last
  • Agent 99
  • alas
  • amusing
  • annoying
  • archival
  • betsy lerner
  • boring
  • Count Down To WR's Identity
  • darin strauss
  • earnest
  • exemplary
  • famous
  • industry response
  • jacob appel
  • just plain crappy
  • mean
  • media attention
  • MFA question
  • misguided
  • Narrative Magazine
  • New Yorker
  • nice
  • question of the month
  • rejection advice
  • rejection confession
  • reversal rejection
  • rosemary ahern
  • secret agent man
  • snap
  • strange
  • the death of fiction
  • tiered
  • Tin House
  • victory over rejection
  • Vonnegut
  • VQR
  • what the google?
  • WR's journey

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2015 (2)
    • ▼  January (2)
      • Next Readings: NYC! Thursday, Jan 15th at KGB Bar ...
      • Did You Know Cambridge Was Its Own Place? READING ...
  • ►  2014 (130)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2012 (108)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2011 (211)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2010 (49)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

humpty
View my complete profile