Literary Rejections on Display: John Fox Makes the Skies ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Agent 99 Bites

Posted on 5:52 AM by humpty

People, people, people: You are going to hate this almost as much as I do. First, I ask you to recall that it's been a year of my working with said Agent 99 from the large fancy literary agency. Back and forth we went with changes and revisions and her idea about how to "fix" my novel. Together here at LROD we have discussed the merits of working on edits with an agent, of compromising one's art, but we have seen nothing like this so far. Are you ready for it? I am going to leave the picking apart of this amazing rejection to beat all rejections to you and your witty, wonderful ways.  You may also feel free to berate me about being naive enough to believe I was finally on my way; all I had to do was fix "a little structural problem" without "muddling" everything up, and that would be that. Have at it! I am taking to my bed today. As for our recent discussions about whether or not it is a good idea to respond to rejection letters, I thought of writing the following: Dear Agent 99: I'm not sure what's worse this week, the fact that after stringing me along for an entire calendar year, you are now rejecting me because my novel now seems muddled and always seemed to dark, or the fact that I have to face a painful biopsy for some suspected cancer.  You really stink.  Best, W,R. Of course, I will let my silence speak instead. Sadly, friends, the part about suspected cancer is true. I'm sure it's going to turn out perfectly fine and not be anything malignant, but then again, for a cynic, I am eternally optimistic.  I have a biopsy tomorrow, so may not get online to post until next week. Send some good thoughts my way if you are able. Man...life can be a kick in the teeth, right? What a week!

Here's what Agent 99 had to say:

Dear _________:   
     This is a difficult email for me to write, but after a lot of time and careful reads from me and a few trusted colleagues here, I’m afraid I’m going to have to walk away from [slightly incorrect Title of Book...really? You couldn't get it right?]. I really do admire you personally and as a writer, and I’m sorry it took so long for me to make this decision, but I don’t think we’re seeing eye-to-eye editorially in the way I would like. 
     I think you’re such a talented writer, and I love your style and your unique sense of prose and voice. That said, ultimately the book still isn’t working in the way I would need it to in order be its very best advocate. I have too many hesitations remaining, and indeed, even though we decided it was best to tie the two parts together (which I do think is crucial to the book) I’m still not seeing the execution I would like.
      The redraft has also confused the original intent of the book and muddled some of the elements I loved earlier on. In this incarnation, it seems so obvious to me that [name of character] is the culprit, and the adding in of [detail] and the [different detail] from the start creates so many plot lines, so many characters to focus on, that I lost [main character's name] a bit. I also still find the darkness of the book overbearing, an issue I’ve had throughout the times I’ve read, and worry that you haven’t found a way to alleviate this. 
     It’s very unusual that I take someone on editorially unless I truly believe in them, and I do believe in you, absolutely. But I also think we’ve come to an impasse. I only hope that giving you my time and advice on the manuscript has helped you in your journey a bit, and I’m sorry to say that my love for the book is not enough to take it forward. You and this novel deserve the passionate representation that I can’t provide, and so I think I should step aside before we go any further. I’m certain that I’ll see your name on shelves someday, and I’ll be cheering from the sidelines. 
     Yours,
     Agent 99
p.s. As you can see, she's really not "mine". Yours is just a nice thing people say at the end of a terrible letter. Oh well. Fuck it.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Agent 99, WR's journey | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Next Readings: NYC! Thursday, Jan 15th at KGB Bar and Sunday at Book Culture (81st & Columbus)
    Last Friday at the reading in Cambridge @HarvardBooks, co-sponsored by @Grubstreet, I met a loyal LROD reader, who is a blogger and novelist...
  • Count Down Day 25--Why No One Comments on My Blog
    "Man, you're not getting no comments...what's up with that?" was a comment I received just a few days ago. This is from so...
  • One Man Guy by Michael Barakiva
    Michael's book title spells OMG and it is released today! Here's what he wants you to know about his victory over rejection:  ...
  • Is It Rejection Cartoon Tuesday Already?
    Why, yes, my friends, it is rejection cartoon Tuesday. Here you go:
  • A New Digital New Yorker Rejection is in Play
    I received the following notice from an LROD reader, who received a new (signed) New Yorker digital rejection that varies from our last digi...
  • Double Neg Pretentious: Not Without Merit
    This irritating rejection says it formally:   "While your proposal is not without merit, we are forced to give serious consideration to...
  • Subject Object Confusion
    A friend of mine posted this rejection note on her blog: "I really liked the concept but the story missed its chance to connect with me...
  • Don't Come Calling Without An Agent
    Looks like Tin House has a new policy. The mouse who sent this in noted that he would no longer be reading Tin House in protest.  What do y...
  • When Assholes Fly
    This is a fantastic rejection letter: a) referral to a different editor, b) a tip about what will and will not work for the publication. Als...
  • Independence Day 2011
    Happy 4th of July, Rosemary Ahern (wherever you are).

Categories

  • A book at last
  • Agent 99
  • alas
  • amusing
  • annoying
  • archival
  • betsy lerner
  • boring
  • Count Down To WR's Identity
  • darin strauss
  • earnest
  • exemplary
  • famous
  • industry response
  • jacob appel
  • just plain crappy
  • mean
  • media attention
  • MFA question
  • misguided
  • Narrative Magazine
  • New Yorker
  • nice
  • question of the month
  • rejection advice
  • rejection confession
  • reversal rejection
  • rosemary ahern
  • secret agent man
  • snap
  • strange
  • the death of fiction
  • tiered
  • Tin House
  • victory over rejection
  • Vonnegut
  • VQR
  • what the google?
  • WR's journey

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (130)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (10)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2012 (108)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ▼  2011 (211)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ▼  September (14)
      • An Open Proposal to Secret Agent Man
      • A Promise for You
      • Update: Biopsy and Books
      • Agent 99 Bites
      • Agent Talk Back
      • "Preclude"...A Good Penn State Word
      • How to Succeed in Rejection
      • An Agent Writes In...But Not My Agent
      • Isn't The 9th Letter "I"?
      • Dear Occupant...
      • Dear Loser...
      • It Was the Worst of Times. It was the Worst of Times.
      • Passing The Time
      • Here Comes the Sun
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (19)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2010 (49)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (8)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

humpty
View my complete profile